USPTO serial 78097617
DIAGNOSTIC CONSTELLATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DIAGNOSTIC CONSTELLATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin J. McDevitt
Kevin J. McDevitt Neal & McDevitt, LLC1776 Ash StreetNorthfield, IL 60093UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Diagnostic preparations for scientific, research or forensics use; genetic identity tests comprised of reagents; paternity identity tests comprised of reagents; reagents for scientific or research use; chemicals for use in the manufacture of pharmaceuticals; reagents for testing the sterility of medical equipment; reagents for testing the sterility of pharmaceuticals and injectable solutions | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Clinical medical reagents; diagnostic reagents for clinical or medical laboratory use; diagnostic reagents for in vitro use in biochemistry, clinical chemistry and microbiology; medical diagnostic reagents; diagnostic preparations for clinical or medical laboratory use; medical diagnostic test strips for use in the field of cardiovascular disease, auto-immunity, central nervous system disorders, infectious diseases and cancer; protease inhibitors for clinical or medical laboratory use; pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of cardiovascular disease, auto-immunity, central nervous system disorders, infectious diseases and cancer | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Sequencing-based genotyping computer software for use in the determination of resistance mutations; computer software for collection, organization, analysis, integration, and communication of information for scientific, research, forensics, paternity, diagnostics, or clinical use, excluding from the foregoing computer software for operational control of irrigation systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Pharmaceutical advice; pharmaceutical drug development services; consultation, namely, product development consultation; research, namely, medical research, product research and development; development, namely, research and development of new products for others; medical diagnostic services in the field of cardiovascular disease, auto-immunity, central nervous system disorders, infectious diseases and cancer; computer services, namely, providing databases and information about scientific information in the field of cardiovascular disease, auto-immunity, central nervous system disorders, infectious diseases and cancer and computer software design for others; biotechnology services, namely, development of new technology for others in the field of biotechnology; licensing of intellectual property; technical consultation and research in the field of biotechnology, life science, and medical diagnostics | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PE Corporation (NY)
- Other trademarks owned by APPLERA CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by CELERA CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by CELERA CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DIAGNOSTIC CONSTELLATION
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 31, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 27, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 4, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 15, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 12, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 22, 2006 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 31, 2005 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 29, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 29, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 16, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |