USPTO serial 78097931
QUIXOTE DESIGN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GASKINS, TONJA M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QUIXOTE DESIGN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott Sullivan
JOHN PICKERILL FREDRIKSON & BYRON PA200 S 6TH ST STE 4000PILLSBURY CTRMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | pillows | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 15, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 25, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 2, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 11, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 31, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 31, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |