Drawing for PERSONAL ENERGY MANAGEMENT TRACKER

USPTO serial 78098014

PERSONAL ENERGY MANAGEMENT TRACKER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HAYASH, SUSAN C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PERSONAL ENERGY MANAGEMENT TRACKER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian Geoghegan

BRIAN GEOGHEGAN PERKINS COIE LLP1201 THIRD AVESTE 4800SEATTLE, WA 98101

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Online energy consumption management services; online informational services in the fields of energy sales, management and consumptionACTIVE—
042Technology automation services in the nature of local and remote monitoring and control of heating, ventilation and air conditioning equipment and electric and gas appliances and devices for home and business; consulting in the field of home and business automation technology; and online informational services in the field of home and business automation technology; online energy consumption monitoring servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 4, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 4, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 20, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 27, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 7, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 3, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 3, 2004GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 2, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 5, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 20, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 14, 2003EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 10, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 7, 2002GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 13, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 13, 2002GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance