Drawing for THE RAIL NETWORK

USPTO serial 78098052

THE RAIL NETWORK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE RAIL NETWORK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James K. Lewis

JAMES K LEWIS PATTON BOGGS LLPP O BOX 270930LOUISVILLE, CO 80027-5015UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Wireless transmission of multimedia data to transit vehiclesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 2, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 2, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 10, 2003EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 8, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 1, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Apr 28, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 28, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 25, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 8, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 7, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 20, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 20, 2002TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 20, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance