USPTO serial 78098101
KERI IS SO VERY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 17, 2003
- Examiner
- FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with KERI IS SO VERY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Westwood-Squibb Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Buffalo, NY
Other trademarks owned by Westwood-Squibb Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Westwood-Squibb Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Buffalo, NY
Other trademarks owned by Westwood-Squibb Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Westwood-Squibb Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Buffalo, NY
Other trademarks owned by Westwood-Squibb Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
PRINCETON, NJ
BASEL, CH
NEW YORK, NY
Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Westwood-Squibb Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Westwood-Squibb Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Westwood-Squibb Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by E.R. SQUIBB & SONS LLC
- Other trademarks owned by NOVARTIS AG
- Other trademarks owned by BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named KERI IS SO VERY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 25, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 5, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Nov 1, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 21, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |