USPTO serial 78098242
DON'T WORRY . . . DRINK HAPPY!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2935990Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 29, 2005
- Examiner
- SMITH, REBECCA A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 100 - MANAGING ATTORNEY
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DON'T WORRY . . . DRINK HAPPY!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Raynarldo K. Whitty
RAYNARLDO K WHITTY PITTMAN LAW GROUP, PL528 E PARK AVETALLAHASSEE, FL 32301UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages, namely, vodka | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 4, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Happy Vodka Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Happy Vodka Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Happy Vodka Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named DON'T WORRY . . . DRINK HAPPY!
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2014 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Jun 25, 2014 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 29, 2014 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 4, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 15, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 29, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 18, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 30, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 3, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |