Drawing for PETROBRAS ENERGY & LIFE

USPTO serial 78098313

PETROBRAS ENERGY & LIFE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OSBORNE, STANLEY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PETROBRAS ENERGY & LIFE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard N. Aronson

HOWARD N ARONSON LACKENBACH SIEGEL LLPLACKENBACH SIEGEL BLDGONE CHASE RDSCARSDALE, NY 10583

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Dissemination of advertising matter; Business management for others; Promoting sports competitions and events for others; Office functions and administrative services for the petroleum industry, namely, database management, production scheduling, payroll processing and accounting and tracking employee information and production schedulesACTIVE—
036Financial sponsorship of sports teams, competitions and events for othersACTIVE—
041Educational services, namely, conducting classes, seminars, and workshops in the field of sports education and health promotion; entertainment, namely, arranging and conducting sports tournaments; providing facilities for sports tournaments; sports training services namely, providing personal training schedules and programsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 20, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 20, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 15, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 15, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 15, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 20, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 20, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 20, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 14, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 11, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 11, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 11, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 22, 2006CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Feb 22, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 23, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 6, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 6, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 3, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 3, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 14, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 25, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 26, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 10, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 3, 2004XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 22, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 20, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 28, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 3, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 23, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 13, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 23, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance