USPTO serial 78098331
EMOCIEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 21, 2005
- Examiner
- BLANDU, FLORENTINA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EMOCIEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Les Laboratoires de Biologie Vegetale Yves Rocher
La Gacilly, FR
Other trademarks owned by Les Laboratoires de Biologie Vegetale Yves Rocher
Les Laboratoires de Biologie Vegetale Yves Rocher
La Gacilly, FR
Other trademarks owned by Les Laboratoires de Biologie Vegetale Yves Rocher
Les Laboratoires de Biologie Vegetale Yves Rocher
La Gacilly, FR
Other trademarks owned by Les Laboratoires de Biologie Vegetale Yves Rocher
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce S. Londa
BRUCE S LONDA NORRIS MCLAUGHLIN & MARCUS PA875 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Soaps; perfumery, namely perfumes, perfumed water, eau de toilette, after-shave, body care perfumed products, namely skin creams, bath and shower perfumed gels, and deodorants; hair lotions; cosmetics, namely perfumed body milk, perfumed body cream for use on the skin, perfumed body lotions, make-up removal products, namely cleansing milk, lotion, make-up removal cream, exfoliation mask, disposable wipes impregnated with chemicals or compounds for removal of make-up, eye make-up removing lotion; beauty care products, namely day cream for use on the skin, night cream for use on the skin, water-based lotion, complexion cream, facial oils, sunscreen cream; spray lotions, moisturizing masks, anti-wrinkle masks, non-greasing masks, body care products, namely body milk, body cream, body lotion | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Les Laboratoires de Biologie Vegetale Yves Rocher
- Other trademarks owned by Les Laboratoires de Biologie Vegetale Yves Rocher
- Other trademarks owned by Les Laboratoires de Biologie Vegetale Yves Rocher
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named EMOCIEL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 29, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 9, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 22, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 30, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 18, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |