CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for LOFT LIVING

USPTO serial 78098348

LOFT LIVING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PERRY, KIMBERLY B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LOFT LIVING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jess M. Collen

JESS M COLLEN COLLEN IPTHE HOLYOKE-MANHATTAN BLDG80 S HIGHLAND AVEOSSINING, NY 10562

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024Draperies, curtains, namely, fabric bed canopies, wall canopies, shower curtains, window curtains; duvets, duvet covers, bed skirts, shams, tablecloths, table linens, namely, reversible place mats, reversible table runners, valences, comforters, slip covers, bedspreads, bed ruffles, textile place mats, pillow cases and fabrics used in the manufacture of the foregoing itemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 8, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 8, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 5, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 13, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 24, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 26, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 26, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 3, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 30, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 16, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 16, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 3, 2005PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jun 10, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 10, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 31, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 27, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 16, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 16, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2004CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 15, 2004CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Oct 21, 2004RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 30, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 17, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 6, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 18, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 18, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 16, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 18, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 30, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 30, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance