USPTO serial 78098466
DIMENSIONALFX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3624614Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 19, 2009
- Examiner
- BLANDU, FLORENTINA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DIMENSIONALFX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John C. Pickerill
JOHN C PICKERILL FREDRIKSON & BYRON PA200 S 6TH ST STE 4000MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Prepaid telephone calling cards, magnetically encoded; mouse pads, DVDs and CDs featuring music or spoken word, magnetically encoded loyalty and membership cards | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 30, 2001 |
| 016 | Packaging, paper goods, and printed matter, namely, trading cards, gift cards, plastic bubble flat packs and windowed flat packs for wrapping or packaging, self-mailing envelopes with addressing labels, accordion sleeves for holding and protecting stamps, plastic foil wraps for cosmetic packaging, clear plastic packaging, plastic, foil, and paper display boxes, registered holograms, decals, stickers, poster art, cardboard boxes, covers for binders, cardboard discs for trading, static cling stickers, prepaid telephone calling cards, not magnetically encoded, counter placemats of paper and cardboard, advertising strips of paper and cardboard, blank and printed product labels not of textiles, printed paper promotional and advertisement signs, printed paper signs, namely, table tents, paper hang tags, printed menus, paper cover sleeves for videocassettes, printed stickers for video, DVD, and cd boxes, cardboard video, DVD, and cd boxes; cardboard floor display units for merchandising products | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 30, 2001 |
| 040 | Laminating of metal plates, plastic sheets, paper, cardboard, foil and lenticular material; design printing, lithographic printing, and offset printing, all for others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 30, 2001 |
| 042 | Custom design of packaging for others, graphic art design services for others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 30, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by UV Color, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by UV Color, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by UV Color, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DIMENSIONALFX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 25, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 17, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 19, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 16, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 20, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2008 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 12, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 23, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 17, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 5, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jul 5, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 5, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 2, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2005 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 20, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 12, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 16, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 28, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 3, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |