USPTO serial 78098595
SYNAGOGUE SOFTBALL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2673459Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 7, 2003
- Examiner
- HAYASH, SUSAN C
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SYNAGOGUE SOFTBALL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LOS ANGELES, CA
LOS ANGELES, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | ORGANIZING COMMUNITY SPORTING EVENTS IN THE NATURE OF A SOFTBALL LEAGUE CONSISTING OF VARIOUS SYNAGOGUES | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Jan 25, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2003 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 6, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 6, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 16, 2002 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |