USPTO serial 78099068
AVALON AT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRACEY, KAREN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AVALON AT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brent D. Sokol
PATENT PROSECUTION DEPT JONES DAYFIFTIETH FL555 S FLOWER STLOS ANGELES, CA 90071Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Paper and cardboard articles namely address labels, survey answer sheets, note books, picture books, calendars, announcement cards, blank cards, note cards, business cards, paper mats, printed charts, stationery, posters, signs; drawing pencils; photographs; plastic bags; binders; bulletin boards; printed guides forreal property; printed guides for residential services; journals, and magazines relating to real property and residential services | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Appraising brokering, investing in, and valuing real property; residential property management and providing property management information and information about residential properties to residents via electronic mail in the nature of real property contact referral information, scheduling activities, consumer contact information, consumer categorization | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named AVALON AT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 8, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 30, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 7, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 6, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 25, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 18, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 6, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 17, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 5, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 31, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 29, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 9, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |