USPTO serial 78099085
BLOOMBERG-FON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3225479Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 3, 2007
- Examiner
- RUTLAND, BARBARA A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BLOOMBERG-FON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Aimee Nassau Gardiner
Aimee Nassau Gardiner Bloomberg L.P.731 Lexington AvenueLegal DepartmentNew York, NY 10022Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and software used for user authentication and identification, namely, biometric matching and indexing hardware and software for use in determining the identity of unknown persons and to verify the claimed identity of persons; computer hardware and software for use in accessing information databases and performing personal computing applications in the areas of news, business, finance, current events, entertainment, sports, human interest stories, securities, securities markets and the energy and asphalt industries, analyzing international business and financial news; hardware and software for interactive electronic communication | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 14, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2022 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 2, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 20, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 20, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 9, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 11, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 15, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 6, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | PRRR | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 15, 2004 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| May 12, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 12, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 11, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 2, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 12, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 5, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 5, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 12, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 20, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 31, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 16, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 15, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |