USPTO serial 78099108
SHARADHA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2922536Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 1, 2005
- Examiner
- SLOAN, CYNTHIA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SHARADHA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sharadha Terry Products Limited
Coimbatore, IN
Sharadha Terry Products Limited
Coimbatore, IN
Sharadha Terry Products Limited
Coimbatore, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
AMY J BENJAMIN
AMY J BENJAMIN BENJAMIN LAW PC163 THIRD AVENUESUITE 284NEW YORK, NY 10003Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Bath linen, bed blankets, bed linen, bed sheets, bed spreads, cloth napkins for removing make-up, cotton fabric, curtain fabric, curtains, covers for cushions, duvet covers, duvets, eiderdowns quilts, unfitted fabric furniture covers, finger tips towels, golf towels, handkerchiefs, kitchen towels, household linens, pillow cases, quilts, cloth table covers, table linens, cloth table mats, tea towels, textile napkins, textile place mats, textile wall hangings, towels, upholstery fabrics, wash cloths, and window curtains | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 1994 |
| 025 | Aprons, bathing caps, bathrobes, beach wears, namely, bathing suits, bathing trunks, beach cover-ups, and swim wear, cloth baby bibs, blazers, blouses, briefs, foul weather gears, gloves, head wear, hoods, mittens, muffs, neckerchiefs; night wears, namely, night shirts, pants, polo shirts, robes, shawls, shirts, shorts, socks, stockings, sweatbands, trousers, and underwear | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sharadha Terry Products Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Sharadha Terry Products Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Sharadha Terry Products Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named SHARADHA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 9, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 9, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 20, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 1, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 7, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 6, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 9, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |