Drawing for INNOVATION. SCALABILITY. PERFORMANCE.

USPTO serial 78099229

INNOVATION. SCALABILITY. PERFORMANCE.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2818314Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 24, 2004
Examiner
DWYER, JOHN D
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with INNOVATION. SCALABILITY. PERFORMANCE.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David J. Cho

David J. Cho AT&T Services, Inc.208 S. Akard St.31st FloorDallas, TX 75202-4206

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035TECHNOLOGY INCUBATION SERVICES, NAMELY, BUSINESS CONSULTATION SERVICES IN THE AREAS OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT, TECHNOLOGY COMMERCIALIZATION PLANNING AND STRATEGIC MARKETING OF TECHNOLOGY; TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER SERVICES, NAMELY, THE LICENSING WHOLESALE TRANSFER OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS PRODUCTS, COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY PRODUCTS, PRODUCTS FOR SPEECH PROCESSING AND SPEECH SYNTHESIS, COMPUTERS, PRODUCTS FOR USE IN THE BUILDING, DEVELOPING, AND OPERATING OF GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS, COMPUTER SOFTWARE, AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORK SOFTWARESECTION 8 - CANCELLEDSep 30, 2002
042PRODUCT RESEARCH AND PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES IN THE AREAS OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS, HIGH TECHNOLOGY, SPEECH PROCESSING, SPEECH SYNTHESIS, COMPUTERS, GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS, COMPUTER SOFTWARE, AND TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORK SOFTWARE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES; LICENSING OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IN THE FIELDS OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS, HIGH TECHNOLOGY, SPEECH PROCESSING AND SPEECH SYNTHESIS, COMPUTERS, GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS, COMPUTER SOFTWARE, AND TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORK SOFTWARESECTION 8 - CANCELLEDSep 30, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 26, 2014CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Apr 8, 20108.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Apr 8, 2010APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 7, 2010ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 11, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 24, 2004R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 29, 2003CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Dec 23, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 22, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 12, 2003SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 12, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 2, 2003IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 2, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 2, 2003EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Dec 2, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 17, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 25, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 5, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 1, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 6, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 6, 2002TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 6, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 20, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance