USPTO serial 78099342
R.H.O.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 25, 2005
- Examiner
- FERRAIUOLO, DOMINIC
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with R.H.O.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Rimrock, AZ
Rimrock, AZ
Rimrock, AZ
Rimrock, AZ
Rimrock, AZ
Rimrock, AZ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John J. Stifter
JOHN J STIFTER JOHN J STIFTER ATTORNEY AT LAW1902 WRIGHT PL STE 200CARLSBAD, CA 92008-6583UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHES; NAMELY, BOOTS, HATS, VISORS, BASEBALL CAPS, BELTS, SHIRTS, PANTS, JACKETS, T-SHIRTS, SWEAT SHIRTS, POLO SHIRTS, TANK TOPS, SPORT SHIRTS, GOLF SHIRTS AND PULLOVERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 5, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sellers, Richard Brandon
- Other trademarks owned by Sellers, Richard Brandon
- Other trademarks owned by Sellers, Richard Brandon
- Other trademarks owned by Sellers, Julie M.
- Other trademarks owned by Sellers, Julie M.
- Other trademarks owned by Sellers, Julie M.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named R.H.O.
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 19, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 29, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 10, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 29, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 20, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 19, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 5, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |