USPTO serial 78099364
LACE-STICK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2972636Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 19, 2005
- Examiner
- FERRAIUOLO, DOMINIC
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LACE-STICK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ridgefield, CT, US
Ridgefield, CT, US
Ridgefield, CT, US
Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ideas to Sales LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Ideas to Sales LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Ideas to Sales LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named LACE-STICK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2026 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 19, 2024 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2015 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2015 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 6, 2015 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 6, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 12, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2015 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2010 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Dec 10, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 27, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 9, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 2, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 20, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 10, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 18, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 26, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 6, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 5, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 13, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |