Drawing for VANATI WAKING TO NEW WORLDS

USPTO serial 78099676

VANATI WAKING TO NEW WORLDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VANATI WAKING TO NEW WORLDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009PRE-RECORDED AUDIOTAPES IN THE FIELD OF SELF-GROWTH AND MEDITATIONINACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVEDNov 9, 2001
016BOOKS IN THE FIELD OF SELF-GROWTH AND MEDITATIONINACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVEDNov 9, 2001
041EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY PROVIDING CLASSES IN THE FIELD OF SELF-GROWTH AND MEDITATIONACTIVENov 9, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 8, 2006PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Dec 8, 2005PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Oct 24, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 30, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 30, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 1, 2005GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED—
Feb 1, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 26, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 16, 2004PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
May 28, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 28, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 21, 2003GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 8, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 7, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 7, 20031.BDSec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED—
Jul 7, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2003PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Jan 13, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 27, 2002GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance