USPTO serial 78099972
LORD LONSDALE CHALLENGE BELT FIRST PRESIDENT THE BRITISH BOXING BOARD OF CONTROL 1929 CHAMPIONSHIP OF GREAT BRITAIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BOULTON, KELLY F
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LORD LONSDALE CHALLENGE BELT FIRST PRESIDENT THE BRITISH BOXING BOARD OF CONTROL 1929 CHAMPIONSHIP OF GREAT BRITAIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Craig A. Fieschko
CRAIG A FIESCHKO8000 EXCELSIOR DR STE 400MADISON, WI 53717-1914UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | PROMOTING BOXING COMPETITIONS OF OTHERS; PROMOTING SPORTS COMPETITIONS AND/OR EVENTS OF OTHERS; ASSOCIATION SERVICES, NAMELY, PROMOTING THE INTERESTS AND PUBLIC AWARENESS OF THE SPORT OF BOXING | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT IN THE NATURE OF BOXING CONTESTS; EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, CONDUCTING CLASSES, WORKSHOPS, AND DEMONSTRATIONS IN THE FIELD OF THE SPORT OF BOXING; INSTRUCTION IN THE FIELD OF BOXING; ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, SANCTIONING BOXING COMPETITIONS; PRODUCTION OF RADIO AND TELEVISION PROGRAMS; DISTRIBUTION OF RADIO AND TELEVISION PROGRAMS FOR OTHERS; MOTION PICTURE FILM AND MUSIC PRODUCTION SERVICES; OFFICIATING AT SPORTS CONTESTS; PRODUCTION, POST-PRODUCTION, DISTRIBUTION, SYNDICATION, AND RENTAL OF TELEVISION AND RADIO PROGRAMMING, MOTION PICTURE FILMS, ANIMATED FILMS, AUDIO AND VIDEO RECORDINGS; PRODUCTION AND RENTAL OF INSTRUCTIONAL AND EDUCATIONAL VIDEO CASSETTES AND DIGITAL VIDEO DISCS; PRODUCTION OF LIVE MUSICAL PERFORMANCES; ORGANIZING AND CONDUCTING EDUCATIONAL, CULTURAL AND ENTERTAINMENT EXHIBITIONS FEATURING SPORTING COMPETITIONS, CONTESTS, GAMES, QUIZZES, SPORTING EVENTS, LIVE MUSICAL PERFORMANCES, LIVE THEATRICAL PERFORMANCES, NAMELY, ROAD SHOWS, AND AUDIENCE-PARTICIPATION THEATRICAL PERFORMANCE; ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, CONDUCTING ON-LINE EXHIBITIONS AND DISPLAYS AND INTERACTIVE EXHIBITS IN THE FIELD OF BOXING; EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, CONDUCTING COURSES OF INSTRUCTION IN THE FIELD OF SPORTING EVENTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by British Boxing Board of Control Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named LORD LONSDALE CHALLENGE BELT FIRST PRESIDENT THE BRITISH BOXING BOARD OF CONTROL 1929 CHAMPIONSHIP OF GREAT BRITAIN
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 28, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 1, 2005 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 27, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 13, 2004 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Nov 14, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |