Drawing for SERIOUSLY SIMPLE

USPTO serial 78100329

SERIOUSLY SIMPLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAPPENFIELD, ANN
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SERIOUSLY SIMPLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Potato-based snack foodsACTIVEOct 18, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 20, 2005PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jul 11, 2005PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Jan 11, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 8, 2004MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 8, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 25, 2004LEXTLATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST—
Oct 25, 2004EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Aug 11, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 6, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 25, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 15, 2004PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Jun 15, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 21, 2004PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Apr 22, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 24, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 10, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 10, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 22, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 22, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 28, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 8, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 18, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 9, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 8, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 8, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2002GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 5, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance