USPTO serial 78100378
GIMME GIMME GUMM GANG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARKE, NANCY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GIMME GIMME GUMM GANG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed matter, namely, series of fiction books; art prints; art pictures; comic strip art namely, art prints featuring excerpts from comic strips; mounted and unmounted photographs; printed instructional, educational and teaching materials for kindergarten through eighth grade in areas of science, reading, writing and mathematics; and trading cards in International Class 16 | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Playthings, namely, toy figures, toy vehicles, toy shields, toy goggles, toy vests, toy gloves, toy gum ball machines, toy flashlights, toy weapons; games, namely, board games, card games and action skill games; and playing cards in International Class 28 | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Schirripa, Anthony
- Other trademarks owned by Schirripa, Anthony
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named GIMME GIMME GUMM GANG
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 17, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 15, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 8, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 9, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 11, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 6, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 10, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 11, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 2, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 16, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 11, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 17, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 8, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |