Drawing for THE STORAGE INTELLIGENCE COMPANY

USPTO serial 78101036

THE STORAGE INTELLIGENCE COMPANY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMITH, REBECCA A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE STORAGE INTELLIGENCE COMPANY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas J. Hoffmann, Esq.

THOMAS J HOFFMANN GRAY CARY WARE & FREIDENRICH701 FIFTH AVE STE 7000SEATTLE, WA 98104-7044UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009downloadable computer software for analyzing computer data backup and storage and preparing computer generated and written reports in the field of data backup and storageACTIVEMar 13, 2002
035licensing of computer softwareACTIVEMar 13, 2002
042maintenance of computer software; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problemsACTIVEMar 13, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 19, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Apr 19, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 3, 2005LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED—
Feb 3, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 7, 2004COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 10, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 10, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 10, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 10, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 10, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 20, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 12, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 1, 2002AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 21, 2002IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 21, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 21, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 18, 2002TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 18, 2002EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 19, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 9, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance