Drawing for NUANCE

USPTO serial 78101175

NUANCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NUANCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cynthia B. Summerfield

CYNTHIA B SUMMERFIELD PHARMACIA CORPORATION100 RTE 206 NPEAPACK, NJ 07977UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical preparations, namely preparations for the treatment of infectious diseases, cancer, ophthalmologic conditions and diseases, central nervous systems diseases and disorders, Parkinson's disease, cardiovascular diseases and conditions, migraines; pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment and symptoms of diabetes; gynecological preparations for the treatment of birth control, and treatment for endometriosis; hormonal preparations, namely hormone replacement therapy; analgesics; anti-inflammatory pharmaceutical preparationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 9, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 9, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 30, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 30, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 30, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 10, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 23, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 23, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 23, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 21, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 21, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 21, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 25, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 31, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 11, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 4, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 28, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 22, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 11, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 8, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 15, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance