USPTO serial 78101298
ASHTON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KELLY, JOHN M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ASHTON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Philadelphia, PA
Wilmington, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
M. Kelly Tillery, Esquire
M. Kelly Tillery, Esquire Pepper Hamilton LLP3000 Two Logan SquareEighteenth & Arch StreetsPhiladelphia, PA 19103-2799Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | After-shave gel, after-shave lotions, after-sun lotions, aromatherapy creams, aromatherapy oils, bath beads, bath crystals, bath foam, bath gel, bath lotion, bath oil, bath powder, non-medicated bath salts, body cream, body powder, body oil, body sprays, bubble bath, face creams, face powder, facial cleansers, facial creams, lotions, massage oil, scented body spray, shaving balm, shaving cream, shaving foam, shaving gel, shaving lotion, shower gel, non-medicated skin care preprations, sun block, sun tan lotion, sun tan oil | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Eyeglass cases, eyeglass frames, sunglasses | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Beach bags, beach umbrellas, briefbags, briefcases, briefcase type portfolios, key cases, leather bags for merchandise packaging, leather key chains, luggage, luggage tags, saddlebags, shaving bags sold empty; shoe bags for travel, shoulder bags, souvenir bags, sportsman's hunting bags, suit bags, suit cases, toiletry cases sold empty, travel bags, umbrellas, wallets; golf umbrellas | ACTIVE | — |
| 033 | Alcoholic beverage produced from a brewed malt base, alcoholic coffee-based beverage, alcoholic malt coolers, alcoholic punch, brandy, brandy spirits, vodka, wine | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Holt's Company
- Other trademarks owned by Holt's Company
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named ASHTON
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 8, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 31, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 10, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 2, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 2, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 19, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 19, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 9, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 21, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 21, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 21, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 2, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 9, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 20, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 30, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 30, 2003 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 12, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 12, 2003 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 25, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |