USPTO serial 78101806
911 NEWS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CRAWFORD, MARY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with 911 NEWS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott J. Major
SCOTT J MAJOR MILLEN, WHITE ZELANO & BRANIGAN, PC2200 CLARENDON BLVDSTE 1400ARLINGTON, VA 22201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | series of television, radio, and web casting programs on a broad range of topics, including matters and events relating to public safety; web site; a news organization and network; entertainment, infotainment and news reporting services; production services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 23, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 23, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 15, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 10, 2005 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 26, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 8, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |