USPTO serial 78101807
IMAGEPRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CRAWFORD, MARY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IMAGEPRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSHUA S. BROITMAN
JOSHUA S BROITMAN OSTRAGER CHONG FLAHERTY & BROITMAN PC250 PARK AVE STE 825NEW YORK, NY 10177-0899UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | IMAGE PROJECTION DEVICE FOR USE AS AN ACCESSORY TO A THEATRICAL SPOTLIGHT, NAMELY, A DEVICE FOR PROJECTING IMAGES PRINTED ON PLASTIC SLIDES FROM THE ACCESSORY SLOT OF A THEATRICAL SPOTLIGHT | ACTIVE | Oct 21, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2006 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 4, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 8, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |