USPTO serial 78102052
VOICETOUCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VOICETOUCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Telecommunications and electronic communications services, namely, wireless and cellular telephone services, transmission of streamed sound and audio-visual recordings via the Internet, electronic transmission of data, documents and messages, electronic delivery of images and photographs via a global computer network, electronic mail services, electronic, electric, and digital transmission of voice, data, images, signals and messages, email forwarding services, international, interstate and intrastate telephone services, local and long distance telephone services, online document delivery via a global computer network, and personal communication services; Internet service provider services, namely, providing multiple user access to a global computer information network and providing high speed access to area networks and a global computer information network; network services, namely, networking conferencing services; call forwarding services; telecommunications services, namely, the mobile and fixed, wireless, and wire line electronic transmission of voice, data, paging and facsimiles; mobile and fixed, wireless, and wire line voice messaging services; telephone voicemail services; recording and subsequent wireless transmission of voice messages from and to mobile and fixed wireless telephones and wire line telephones; telecommunications services providing access to telephone networks from outside service areas; providing wireless telecommunications carriers located outside of North America access to the North American cellular network; satellite transmission services; radio and Internet broadcasting services; paging services; wireless digital messaging services; facsimile transmission services; digital messaging services; wireless voicemail services; consulting services in the field of telecommunication, wireless, digital, and cellular telephone services and all types of wireless communication services; providing multiple user access to chat-rooms and bulletin boards relating to a wide variety of information and topics; online service provider services, namely, providing normal and high speed access to private local and wide area computer networks; telecommunications services that allow users to perform electronic business transactions via wireless telephones, personal digital assistants, handheld computers, and mobile data receivers and via a global computer information network, the Internet and private computer information networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AT&T Wireless Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by AT&T Wireless Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CINGULAR WIRELESS II, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named VOICETOUCH
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 13, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 7, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 7, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 6, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 7, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 7, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 20, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 7, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 15, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 25, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 19, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |