USPTO serial 78102336
BRAINSUITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 11, 2006
- Examiner
- LEIPZIG, MARC J
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with BRAINSUITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $548*
Plus Government fees of $1,700
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Munich, DE
Kirchheim/Heimstetten, DE
Kirchheim/Heimstetten, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patrick F. Clunk
Patrick F. Clunk Tucker Ellis LLP950 Main Avenue, Suite 1100Cleveland, OH 44113UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computers; computer software for medical purposes, namely, for neurosurgical, orthopedic, radiotherapeutical and radiosurgical purposes, [ for robot-assisted applications, ] and applications in ear, nose and throat surgery; computer software that may be downloaded from a global computer network for medical purposes, namely, for neurosurgical, orthopedic, radiotherapeutical and radiosurgical purposes, [ for robot-assisted applications, ] and applications in ear, nose and throat surgery; and pre-recorded data carriers, featuring computer software for medical purposes, namely, for neurosurgical, orthopedic, radiotherapeutical and radiosurgical purposes, [ for robot-assisted applications, ] and applications in ear, nose and throat surgery | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | electronic apparatus and image presentation apparatus for medical purposes, namely, for neurosurgical, radiotherapeutical, orthopedic [ and cardiological purposes ] and for application with image-guided localization systems for surgical purposes; electronic apparatus and image presentation apparatus for medical purposes, namely, for image-guided localization systems for surgical purposes; light pointers for medical use; laser light pointers for medical use; infra-red light pointers for medical use; neurosurgical instruments and apparatus; radiotherapeutic and radiosurgical apparatus; devices for detection and adjustment of radiation points for medical purposes; systems and components to precisely position patients for radiotherapeutic, radiosurgical or neurosurgical purposes, namely, collimators, leaf collimators and micro leaf collimators for adjusting and forming ray forms in radiotherapeutic or radiosurgical applications, infrared and video cameras, patient markers, monitors, isocenter phantoms, calibration phantoms, patient trays, head holders including adaptors, vacuum pumps, vacuum cushions, referencing stars, ultrasound phantoms and ultrasound adaptors, x-ray registering kits; nuclear spin tomographs; intra-operative, image-guided localization systems for surgical purposes; intra-operative, image-guided localization systems for neurosurgical, orthopedic, stereotactic, radiotherapeutical and radiosurgical purposes; intra-operative, image-guided localization systems for application in ear, nose and throat surgery; systems for software-controlled precision treatment in neurosurgery, orthopedics, radiotherapy or radiosurgery and in ear, nose, and throat surgery, including localizers, stereotactic and neurosurgical arcs, biopsy kits, fixation adaptors, instrument calibration matrixes and fixation rings, planning stations, computers, couch mounts, collimators, target positioners, film holders, mask systems, couch stabilizers, couch adaptors, radiation devices, linear accelerators, gantries, microscope adaptors, fixation pins, head and neck immobilization units; probes, sensors, electronic apparatus and image presentation apparatus all being parts of medical localization systems; medical instruments and apparatus for three-dimensional registration and/or referencing patient location data by producing light markings, in particular light reflection points, by means of light beamers, in particular infrared light beamers and/or light pointers or laser light beamers | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | [ Computer programming services, namely, developing programs for others for neurosurgical, orthopedic, radiotherapeutic or radiosurgical purposes, for application in ear, nose, and throat surgery, for robot-assisted applications, and for three-dimensional registration or referencing of patients; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems related to medical navigation, localization and registration equipment, and for radiotherapeutic or radiosurgical devices ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BrainLAB AG
- Other trademarks owned by BrainLAB AG
- Other trademarks owned by BrainLAB AG
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BRAINSUITE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2017 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2017 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 5, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 14, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 11, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 25, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2012 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 18, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 18, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 29, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2003 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |