USPTO serial 78102565
ULTRABLOC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAYASH, SUSAN C
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ULTRABLOC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lynn Brumfield
LYNN BRUMFIELD MINERALS TECHNOLOGIES INCONE HIGHLAND AVEBETHLEHEM, PA 18017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | mineral products comprised primarily of silicon and aluminum sold in powder form for use as an antiblock in the manufacture of polymer films and packaging materials | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 23, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 5, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 15, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |