USPTO serial 78102589
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kimbley L. Muller
KIMBLEY L MULLER SHELL OIL COMPANY910 LOUISIANAONE SHELL PLZ 4794HOUSTON, TX 77002| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software, in particular computer software for safety systems in industrial processes, namely, computer software for designing, operating, managing, maintaining and modifying automated safety systems in industrial processes. | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Computer software manuals for designing, operating, managing, maintaining and modifying automated safety systems in industrial processes. | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Education and training service, namely, workshops for use of computer software for designing, operating, managing, maintaining and modifying automated safety systems in industrial processes. | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Services to design, operate, manage, maintain and modify of automated safety systems in industrial processes. | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 7, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 20, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2002 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |