USPTO serial 78103207
CRISADA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CRISADA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LONG ISLAND CITY, NY
LONG ISLAND CITY, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EDWARD MEERTINS GEORGE
EDWARD MEERTINS GEORGE ATTORNEY AT LAW4-74 48TH AVE STE 7ALON ISLAND CITY, NY 11109UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Fragrance products, namely, cologne, eau de toilette, perfume splashing water, scented soaps, body powders, bath oils; and cosmetic products, namely, lipsticks, foundations, blushes, eye shadows, mascaras, eyeliners, lipstick liners, nail polishes, nail care preparations; skin treatment products, namely, cleansers, toners, moisturizers, eye creams, hand and body lotions and body and facial soap; sun screen preparations; and hair products, namely, shampoos, conditioners, styling gels, and sprays | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2002 |
| 018 | Clutches, shoulder bags, purses, handbags, pocketbooks, cosmetic bags sold empty, tote bags, saddle bags, backpacks, gym bags, knapsacks, duffel bags, travel bags, roll bags, sling bags, grooming kits sold empty, suit bags, tie cases, satchels, garment bags for travel, coin purses, drawstring pouches, overnight bags, wallets, key cases, umbrellas, parasols, trunks, suit-cases, bill-folds, credit card cases, briefcases, attache cases and vanity cases sold empty | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2002 |
| 025 | Women's clothing, namely, dresses, gowns, suits, ball gowns, coats, pants, skirts, blouses, sweaters, scarves, swimsuits, belts, hats, undergarments, gloves and veils; wedding gowns, bridal veils and headwear; and men's clothing; namely, jackets, trousers, ties, shirts, coats, sweaters, undergarments, gloves, hats and belts; footwear | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2006 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 21, 2006 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 17, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 26, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 13, 2005 | MAB7 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 11, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 19, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 29, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 17, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 10, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 21, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |