USPTO serial 78103382
PUSH TO TALK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- OFFICE OF PUBLIC RECORDS - SPECIAL HANDLING SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PUSH TO TALK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EDWARD GRAY
EDWARD W GRAY JR MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP2000 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW STE 5500WASHINGTON, DC 20006-1888UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Hardware and software for use in communications networks, namely, Internet protocol and telecommunications network transmitters, receivers, converters, and routers which allow the user to send voice, data, pictures, music and video over wireless networks | ABANDONED | Apr 18, 2003 |
| 038 | Telecommunication services, namely, providing voice, data, pictures, music and video via wireless networks | ABANDONED | Apr 18, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 2, 2004 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2003 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 20, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 13, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 22, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |