USPTO serial 78103517
MENAGGIO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MENAGGIO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert C. Kain, Jr.
ROBERT C KAIN JR FLEIT, KAIN, GIBBONS GUTMAN & BONGINI PL750 SE THIRD AVE STE 100FT LAUDERDALE, FL 33316UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | pizza boxes | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | canned and frozen soups and soup bases; seafood, namely, tuna, calamari, clams, clam juice, shrimp, fish, processed anchovies, and sardines; canned and frozen vegetables, namely, beans; vegetable blends, processed artichoke hearts; oils, namely, olive, soy, safflower, nut and vegetable oils; processed domestic and imported green and black olives; tomato products, namely, tomato paste, tomato puree, canned whole tomatoes, canned diced tomatoes, canned tomato filets, canned ground tomatoes, canned stewed tomatoes; pickles, processed cherry peppers, processed banana peppers; deli ham; prepared entrees consisting primarily of stew and chicken | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | pasta, namely, spaghetti, fettuccini, ziti, angel hair, shells, and spirals, dried and frozen spices; minced garlic in oil; basil in oil; flour, namely, hi-gluten flour, pizza flour, all purpose flour, grain and specialty flour; tomato sauce; pizza sauce; pasta sauce; salad dressings, namely, Italian, creamy dressing, oil based dressings; mayonnaise, relish, prepared entrees consisting primarily of lasagna, ravioli, manicotti, and tortellini | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Syndicated Food Service International, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Syndicated Food Service International, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named MENAGGIO
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 19, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 27, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 7, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |