Drawing for E PAGE SOLUTIONS

USPTO serial 78103617

E PAGE SOLUTIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with E PAGE SOLUTIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ERIC T. HELMAN

ERIC T HELMAN ELECTRONIC PAGE SOLUTIONS INC2951 FLOWERS RD S STEATLANTA, GA 30341UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Online document delivery via a global computer network; Electronic delivery of images and photographs via a global computer network; Electronic transmission of data and documents via computer terminalsABANDONEDApr 11, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 1, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 6, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 6, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2005MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 6, 2005ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 6, 2005OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Dec 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2004MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 3, 2004ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 3, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Dec 3, 2004OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
May 1, 2003OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 28, 2003ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 30, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 4, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 31, 2002GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 2, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 3, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 21, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 21, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2002TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 4, 2002GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 14, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance