USPTO serial 78103657
PTT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAYASH, SUSAN C
- Law office
- OFFICE OF PUBLIC RECORDS - SPECIAL HANDLING SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PTT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward W. Gray, Jr
EDWARD W GRAY JR MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP2000 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW STE 5500WASHINGTON, DC 20006-1888UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Hardware and software for use in communications networks, namely, Internet protocol and telecommunications network transmitters, receivers, converters, and routers which allow the user to send voice, data, pictures, music and video over wireless networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunication services, namely, providing voice, data, pictures, music and video via wireless networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2004 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 22, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2003 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 22, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |