Drawing for THERAJET

USPTO serial 78104219

THERAJET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMPKINS, TRICIA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THERAJET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrea P. Denklau

ANDREA P DENKLAU WHIRLPOOL PROPERTIES, INC500 RENAISSANCE DRSTE 101SAINT JOSEPH, MI 49085

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Jets for spas in the nature of heated pools and whirlpool baths.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 31, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 31, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 31, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 31, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 25, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 5, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 4, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 4, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 5, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 5, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 24, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 17, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance