USPTO serial 78104669
ENDUR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ENDUR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Keith E. Sharkin
KEITH E SHARKIN KING & SPALDING1185 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | providing information technology business auditing services for others; operation and management of secure data center and storage facilities and related office space for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | risk management analysis; leasing and rental of office space for a secure data center and data storage facility | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | facilities management services, namely, maintenance of data centers and computer storage facilities with respect to electrical and mechanical systems; facilities management services for data center and storage facilities, namely, installation, repair, and maintenance of automated building management and utility systems, heating ventilation, and air conditioning systems and equipment and maintenance of information technology systems, namely, generators, air conditioning units, transfer switches, uninterruptible power supplies, power distribution units, battery systems, chillers, onsite power generators, building management systems, network systems, fire detection and suppression systems, access control systems and closed circuit television monitoring systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | providing power sources to customers, namely, generation of high quality energy from an on-site source | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | leasing and rental of computer facilities, namely, a secure data center and storage facility; technical consulting services, namely, assisting tenants and customers of data center and storage facilities in the assessment, planning and implementation of programs to maintain operational continuity, and assisting customers in understanding the requirements and options for uninterrupted power and cooling for data centers, and how to put those requirements into a business context and in computer disaster recovery planning | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Endur, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ENDUR, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ENDUR
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 22, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 5, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 26, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 23, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |