USPTO serial 78104816
DENSEPACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YARD, JOHN S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DENSEPACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cynthia Clarke Weber
CYNTHIA CLARKE WEBER SUGHRUE MION PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037-3202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Photonic integrated circuits; multiplexers; wavelength division multiplexers; dense wavelength division multiplexers | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | ASSEMBLY OF PHOTONIC INTEGRATED CIRCUITS AND PHOTONIC INTEGRATED DEVICES FOR OTHERS; CUSTOM MANUFACTURE OF PHOTONIC INTEGRATED CIRCUITS AND PHOTONIC DEVICES FOR OTHERS; PACKAGING OF PHOTONIC INTEGRATED CIRCUITS AND COMPONENTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | PACKAGING DESIGN FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF PHOTONIC INTEGRATED CIRCUITS AND PHOTONIC DEVICES; PRODUCT SAFETY TESTING IN THE FIELD OF PHOTONIC INTEGRATED CIRCUITS AND PHOTONIC DEVICES; TESTING, ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION OF THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF PHOTONIC INTEGRATED CIRCUITS AND PHOTONIC DEVICES FOR THE PURPOSE OF CERTIFICATION; DESIGN FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF PHOTONIC INTEGRATED CIRCUITS AND PHOTONIC DEVICES; SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IN THE FIELD OF PHOTONIC INTEGRATED CIRCUITS AND PHOTONIC DEVICES; PATENT LICENSING AND LICENSING OF TECHNOLOGY IN THE FIELD OF PHOTONIC INTEGRATED CIRCUITS AND PHOTONIC DEVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DenseLight Semiconductors Pte. Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by DenseLight Semiconductors Pte. Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DENSEPACK
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 28, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 19, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 18, 2004 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| May 26, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 7, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 17, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |