USPTO serial 78104821
VERY IMPORTANT PATIENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3066489Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 7, 2006
- Examiner
- LOUGHRAN, BARBARA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with VERY IMPORTANT PATIENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Physicians' Organization of Western Michigan, Inc.
Grand Rapids, MI
Other trademarks owned by Physicians' Organization of Western Michigan, Inc.
Physicians' Organization of Western Michigan, Inc.
Grand Rapids, MI
Other trademarks owned by Physicians' Organization of Western Michigan, Inc.
Physicians' Organization of Western Michigan, Inc.
Grand Rapids, MI
Other trademarks owned by Physicians' Organization of Western Michigan, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James A. Christopherson
JAMES A CHRISTOPHERSON DINGEMAN, DANCER & CHRISTOPHERSON PLC100 PARK STTRAVERSE CITY, MI 49684UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 045 | CONCIERGE SERVICES FOR OTHERS IN THE NATURE OF PROVIDING GUARANTEED PREFERRED PRIORITY STATUS TO PARTICIPATING MEMBER MEDICAL PATIENTS BY PARTICIPATING PHYSICIANS' OFFICES IN MAKING MEDICAL APPOINTMENTS, PROVIDING EXPANDED PATIENT TELEPHONE ACCESS TO PHYSICIANS, PROVIDING GUARANTEED SAME DAY MEDICAL OFFICE VISIT APPOINTMENTS AND GUARANTEEING THE PRESENCE OF THE PATIENT'S PRIMARY CARE PHYSICIAN DURING MEDICAL EXAMINATION OF PATIENTS BY A REFERRED MEDICAL SPECIALIST | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Physicians' Organization of Western Michigan, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Physicians' Organization of Western Michigan, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Physicians' Organization of Western Michigan, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named VERY IMPORTANT PATIENT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 24, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 25, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 20, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 28, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 5, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 18, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 15, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 28, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 10, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 17, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 24, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 4, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 14, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 14, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |