Drawing for PALMSOURCE

USPTO serial 78105313

PALMSOURCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PAPPAS, MATTHEW
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PALMSOURCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Heidi E. Klein

FRANCINE MILLER DONOVAN & YEE LLP110 GREENE STREETSUITE 700NEW YORK, NY 10012

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Promotion of the goods and services of others by placing advertisement and promotional displays in an electronic site accessed via electronic communications networks; promoting the goods and services of others by providing a website at which users can link to a wide variety of online retail stores; computerized online ordering services featuring retail distributorship of books, music, games and computer software; computerized online ordering services featuring retail distributorship of handheld computers, software, accessories, peripherals and services thereforABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 17, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 10, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 21, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 21, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 21, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 11, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 22, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Dec 22, 2006COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2006TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Dec 22, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 22, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 23, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 21, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 21, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 6, 2006OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 6, 2006OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Mar 31, 2005DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 27, 2005DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jun 15, 2004OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jun 15, 2004OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 25, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 5, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 22, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 19, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 6, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 13, 2003GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 12, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 5, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 12, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 19, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 19, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance