USPTO serial 78105721
PEST FINDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 27, 2004
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PEST FINDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jaime A. Siegel
JAIME A SIEGEL1 MDW LNWOODCLIFF LAKE, NJ 07677UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | portable electronic pest detector | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 14, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 27, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 27, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 21, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | IURF | IU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2003 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 27, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 21, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |