USPTO serial 78105783
ALLERGYREWARDS PROGRAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ALLERGYREWARDS PROGRAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sheldon R. Pontaoe
SHELDON R PONTAOE GLAXOSMITHKLINEMAI-B443FIVE MOORE DRRESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC 27709Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed materials, namely brochures, pamphlets, leaflets, booklets, mailings and print advertisements in publications/magazines, featuring health information about respiratory disorders and treatments for respiratory disorders | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Health information services, namely, providing information on respiratory disorders and the treatment of respiratory disorders to patients, physicians, pharmacists and other healthcare professionals; providing information on respiratory disorders and the treatment of respiratory disorders through the Internet and a telephone voice response system; Providing information on respiratory disorders and treatments for respiratory disorders via radio and television broadcasts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SmithKline Beecham Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by SmithKline Beecham Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named ALLERGYREWARDS PROGRAM
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 25, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 4, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 11, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 25, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 10, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 10, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 19, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 27, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 7, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |