Drawing for TAXI BY GETTY IMAGES

USPTO serial 78106072

TAXI BY GETTY IMAGES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
โ€”
Examiner
ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TAXI BY GETTY IMAGES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Heidi L. Sachs

HEIDI L SACHS PERKINS COIE LLP1201 3RD AVE STE 4800SEATTLE, WA 98103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE ON CD-ROM DISKS OR DOWNLOADABLE FORMAT FOR USE IN THE FIELDS OF CREATING AND MANIPULATING VISUAL MEDIA, GRAPHIC IMAGES, NEWS IMAGES, ILLUSTRATIONS, DIGITAL ANIMATION, VIDEO CLIPS, FILM FOOTAGE AND AUDIO DATA; COMPUTER SOFTWARE ON CD-ROM DISKS OR DOWNLOADABLE FORMAT FOR DESKTOP PUBLISHING, ELECTRONIC PUBLISHING AND PRINTING OF TYPE FACES, CLIP ART AND PHOTOGRAPHIC IMAGES, BUT EXPRESSLY EXCLUDING BOOK PUBLISHING; PHOTOGRAPHIC SLIDE TRANSPARENCIES; PRE-RECORDED DIGITAL CD-ROM DISKS FEATURING PICTURES, IMAGES, TEXT, AND SOUND; COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND CD-ROM DISKS FOR ACCESSING, VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK, STILL IMAGES, MOVING IMAGES, AUDIO AND TEXT; FILE MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE FOR SEARCHING, BROWSING, SELECTING, AND RETRIEVING FILES WITHIN A PROGRAM AND FOR OPENING AND SAVING IMAGES TO VARIOUS FILE FORMATSACTIVEโ€”

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 10, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 12, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTEDโ€”
Jan 2, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILEDโ€”
Jan 2, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 19, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTEDโ€”
Jun 23, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILEDโ€”
Jun 23, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 27, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTEDโ€”
Jan 6, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILEDโ€”
Jan 6, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 1, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTEDโ€”
Jul 1, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILEDโ€”
Jul 1, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 24, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTEDโ€”
Jan 5, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILEDโ€”
Jan 5, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 30, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRSโ€”
Jul 6, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline โ€” usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 13, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 24, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATIONโ€”
Jan 28, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTERโ€”
Jan 14, 2004ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWNโ€”
Nov 13, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Nov 13, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
Aug 25, 2003EMRVEMAIL RECEIVEDโ€”
Mar 19, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWNโ€”
Dec 20, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTERโ€”
Nov 15, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Nov 15, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
May 29, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance