USPTO serial 78106171
BELCOAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BELCOAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Kaufman
JEFFREY H KAUFMAN OBLON SPIVAK MCCLELLAND MAIER ET AL1940 DUKE STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-3451UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | PVD (PHYSICAL VAPOR DEPOSITION) FILMS COATING MACHINE | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | MATERIAL TREATMENT, NAMELY, PHYSICAL VAPOR DEPOSITION FILM PRODUCING OR COATING OF THIN FILMS ON THE SURFACE OF WORKPIECES, SUCH AS CUTTING TOOLS, PUNCHES, MOLDS, DECORATIVE PARTS, ELECTRICAL PARTS, SEMICONDUCTOR SUBSTRATES WAFERS AND SEMICONDUCTOR CHIPS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kabushiki Kaisha Kobe Seiko Sho
- Other trademarks owned by Kabushiki Kaisha Kobe Seiko Sho
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named BELCOAT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 3, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 13, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 5, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 2, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 22, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 2, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 10, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 21, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |