USPTO serial 78106183
AT&T COMBINED CHOICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHHINA, KARANENDRA S
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AT&T COMBINED CHOICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NEW YORK, NY
NEW YORK, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
FRANK L. POLITANO
MICHELE A FARBER AT&T CORP3A253ONE AT&T WAY PO BOX 752BEDMINSTER, NJ 07921Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, LOCAL, LONG DISTANCE, AND INTERNATIONAL VOICE, TEXT, FACSIMILE, VIDEO AND DATA TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES; FRAME RELAY TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES; VIRTUAL NETWORK TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES; ELECTRONIC MAIL AND VOICE MAIL AND MESSAGING SERVICES; ELECTRONIC DATA TRANSMISSION PACKET SERVICES; COMPUTER AIDED TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES AND IMAGES; AUDIO AND VIDEO TELECONFERENCING SERVICES; PRIVATE LINE VOICE, TEXT, FACSIMILE, VIDEO AND DATA TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES; INTEGRATED SERVICES DIGITAL NETWORK (ISDN) TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES; TRANSMISSION OF VOICE, TEXT, FACSIMILE, VIDEO AND DATA VIA SATELLITE, TERRESTRIAL AND UNDERSEA TELECOMMUNICATIONS LINKS; TELEVISION TRANSMISSION SERVICES; 800 TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES; 900 TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES; SWITCHED VOICE, DATA, VIDEO AND MULTIMEDIA SERVICES; LOCATION INDEPENDENT PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES COMPRISING MOBILE VOICE, DATA AND FACSIMILE SERVICES; DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER LINE (DSL) TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES; PROVIDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONNECTIONS TO WORLDWIDE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS, OTHER COMPUTER NETWORKS, ON-LINE SERVICES AND BULLETIN BOARDS; PROVIDING BACK BONE TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORK SERVICES TO OTHERS TO ENABLE THEM TO DISPLAY CONTENT ON WORLDWIDE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS, OTHER COMPUTER NETWORKS, ON-LINE SERVICES AND BULLETIN BOARDS; PROVIDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONNECTIONS TO ON-LINE INFORMATION SERVICES; THE TRANSMISSION OVER CABLE OF ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES AND VOICE, VIDEO, DATA AND FACSIMILE TELEPHONY SERVICES; WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES; PROVIDING AND FACILITATING CONNECTIONS TO TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES, INCLUDING LOCAL AND LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES OF OTHERS; PROVIDING AN ON-LINE COMPUTER DATABASE IN THE FIELD OF TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES OF OTHERS; PROVIDING ON-LINE CHAT ROOMS FOR TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES AMONG COMPUTER USERS CONCERNING A WIDE VARIETY SUBJECTS INCLUDING PERSONAL CARE, HEALTH, SPORTS, NEWS, WEATHER, EDUCATION, SEX, ENTERTAINMENT, FOOD, CLOTHING, HOME ENTERTAINMENT, MUSIC, ART, PHILOSOPHY, POLITICS, ECONOMICS, LANGUAGE, CULTURE AND HISTORY | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 11, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 8, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 16, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 25, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 5, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 2, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 24, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 10, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 21, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |