Drawing for DEFY

USPTO serial 78106300

DEFY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWN, BARBARA TROFFKIN
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DEFY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen Goldstein

ANTHONY GOMEZ8900 XERXES AVE SBLOOMINGTON, MN 55431UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025MENS AND WOMENS SPORTSWEAR AND CLOTHING, NAMELY, SHIRTS, BLOUSES, VESTS, JACKETS, HATS, PANTS, COATS, SWEAT SHIRTS, SWEAT PANTS, T-SHIRTS, SWEATERS, SOCKS, SHOES AND SNEAKERSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 28, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 28, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 25, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 13, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 18, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 10, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2003PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Sep 30, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 14, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Aug 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2003IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Jan 21, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 29, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 9, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 1, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 25, 20021.ADSEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED—
Jul 25, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 6, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance