Drawing for THE GRADUATION GAME

USPTO serial 78106736

THE GRADUATION GAME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KON, ELISSA GARBER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE GRADUATION GAME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Doran J. Ingalls

Doran J. Ingalls Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP1075 West Georgia Street, Suite 2100Vancouver, BC, V6E3G2CANADA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Educational board games, parlor games and trivia board games; accessories for board games, namely, cards for use with board games; playing cardsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 6, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 6, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 6, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 6, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 6, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 2, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 1, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 1, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 19, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 24, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 24, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 18, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 1, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 1, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 6, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 14, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 25, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 4, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 2, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 23, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 23, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 23, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 19, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 19, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 18, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 18, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 18, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 1, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 11, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 24, 2003GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 7, 2003GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 30, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 29, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 29, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 21, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance