Drawing for SNAP IMPRESSIONS

USPTO serial 78106985

SNAP IMPRESSIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PERRY, KIMBERLY B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SNAP IMPRESSIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lisa Winger; Christopher B. Schneider

LISA WINGER CHRISTOPHER B SCHNEIDER NEWELL RUBBERMAID2707 BUTTERFIELD RD STE 100OAK BROOK, IL 60523UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
026HAIR ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, HAIR CLIPSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 12, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 12, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 28, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 9, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 9, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 9, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 9, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 9, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 3, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 3, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 9, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 2, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 2, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 2, 2004COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2004ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 2, 2004REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 11, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 19, 2004REINREINSTATED—
Jan 27, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 27, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 28, 2003IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Jan 28, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 14, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 16, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 6, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 23, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 22, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 20, 2002GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 20, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 14, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance