USPTO serial 78107025
INTERNET LAW & POLICY FORUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2915370Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 28, 2004
- Examiner
- BENZMILLER, ANDREW
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INTERNET LAW & POLICY FORUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brent D. Sanders
BRENT D SANDERS PERKINS COIE LLP1201 THIRD AVE STE 4800SEATTLE, WA 98101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | ASSOCIATION SERVICES, NAMELY PROMOTING THE INTEREST OF INTERNET BUSINESSES AND INTERNET USERS; CONDUCTING BUSINESS AND MARKETING RESEARCH IN THE FIELD OF THE INTERNET AND ELECTRONIC COMMERCE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 30, 1996 |
| 041 | CONDUCTING CONFERENCES, WORKSHOPS, AND SEMINARS IN THE FIELD OF INTERNET AND ELECTRONIC COMMERCE, AND PRINTED MATERIALS DISTRIBUTED IN CONNECTION THEREWITH | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 30, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Internet Law and Policy Forum
- Other trademarks owned by Internet Law and Policy Forum
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named INTERNET LAW & POLICY FORUM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 20, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 14, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2003 | GNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |