USPTO serial 78107443
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Morriston Swansea, GB
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael W. Garvey
MICHAEL W GARVEY PEARNE & GORDON LLP1801 E 9TH ST STE 1200CLEVELAND, OH 44114-3108UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical and biological preparations for scientific purposes and methods, namely synthetic phospholipids for coating micro-pipettes and rods; chemical and biological preparations for inserting nucleotides and other agents, including proteins and synthetic molecules into cells and inserting membrane-associated molecules into their membranes; chemical and biological preparations for laboratory and medical research, namely lipid-tipped micro-pipettes and lipid-tipped micro-rods for cell biological research, ex vivo cell-based gene therapy and intracellular sperm injection (ICSI) techniques for inserting molecules into cells | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Biological and chemical preparations for medial purposes, namely, pharmaceutically acceptable and biological reagents for use in inserting nucleoticles; and other agents, including proteins and synthetic molecules into cells; inserting membrane-associated molecules into their membranes; genetically engineered cells for medical or clinical use, modified cells for medical or clinical use; biological reagents for use in molecular biology | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Kits and apparatus, namely, lipid-tipped micro-pipettes and micro-rods packaged in vials containing inert gas and held in packaging which also acts as a holding rack and with a means of easy filing the micro-pipettes whilst held in its vial for use in cell biological research and medical applications including ex vivo cell based gene therapy and ICSI; genetic engineering kits comprised of lipid-tipped micro-pipettes in vials containing inert gas and held in packaging which acts as a holding rack with a means of easily filing the micro-pipettes with genetic nucleic acids whilst held in its vial; scientific assay kits comprising lipid-tipped micro-pipettes and micro-rods packaged in vials containing inert gas and held in packaging which acts as a holding rack and with a means of easily filing the micro-pipettes whilst held in its vial for use in cell-based assays; parts and fittings therefore | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific and pharmaceutical research services; scientific research and development services; genetic engineering services; medical research services and supporting services, namely, provision of enabling technologies for cell engineering approaches which include cell-based rapid through-put drug screening and ex vivo gene therapy; providing techniques and methodology for inserting genes and other agents into cells | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 16, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 27, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |